In recent months, several pro-government Hungarian media outlets and commentators have begun to depict Germany not as a key European partner, but as a hostile political force working against Hungary’s interests. Through intelligence-based claims, energy disputes and increasingly sharp rhetoric, Berlin is being framed as an external actor interfering in domestic politics and aligning with Kyiv to pressure Budapest.

Articles published by government-close platforms such as Mandiner and Index suggest that German intermediaries played a role in informing the opposition Tisza Party about Ukraine’s alleged decision not to restart oil deliveries through the Druzhba pipeline. According to these reports, the party’s leader Péter Magyar signalled openness to ending Hungary’s reliance on cheap Russian energy if elected, which is a move government narratives present as economically harmful.

Both outlets rely heavily on references to intelligence briefings prepared for the Hungarian government. These accounts imply that Ukraine’s decisions were politically motivated and that Germany acted as a go-between. The underlying message is that Berlin is portrayed not as a neutral EU partner, but as facilitating moves that could weaken Hungary’s energy security.

From partner to adversary

The tone has become even more confrontational in opinion pieces and commentary. Mária Schmidt, a prominent conservative historian and government ally, recently declared on social media that “the Germans have declared war on Russia”, suggesting that Berlin is dragging Europe into a dangerous confrontation. In a longer essay titled Deutschland, Deutschland unter Alles, she paints modern Germany as arrogant, morally hypocritical and historically untrustworthy.

Her writing accuses Germany of undermining Hungary both politically and culturally, while characterising Berlin’s support for Ukraine as reckless militarism. The text repeatedly implies that German leadership seeks dominance over Europe and pressures smaller member states into compliance.

Security conference and political symbolism

The criticism intensified following remarks attributed to German political figures at the Munich Security Conference, where German leaders reportedly expressed hopes for political change in Hungary. Reports linked these statements to Friedrich Merz, portrayed in Hungarian pro-government media as an advocate of confrontation with Russia and stronger European military commitments.

Such framing presents Germany not only as an ideological opponent but as actively supporting Hungary’s domestic opposition and threatening its sovereignty.

A shift in the narrative

The increasingly hostile portrayal marks a notable shift. For years, Germany has been one of Hungary’s most important economic partners, with deep trade and industrial ties, particularly in the automotive sector. Yet recent coverage suggests a deliberate political narrative: casting Berlin as part of a broader Western bloc pressuring Hungary over energy policy, Ukraine and EU alignment.

Analysts say this rhetoric fits a familiar communication strategy. By identifying external adversaries (whether Brussels, Washington or now Berlin), government-friendly media can frame domestic political disputes as matters of national sovereignty.