Subscribe to our social channels to get the latest news about Hungary!
“From stick to spoke”: can Tisza reset relations with the EU and not betray its voters?
Change language:
Ahead of Hungary’s parliamentary elections, the Tisza Party, according to its published platform, proposes a radical shift in foreign policy. The plan is built on contrast with the current government’s policies. Budapest, according to the party’s chief diplomat Anita Orbán, must cease to be a “stick in the wheel” of the European Union and become a “spoke” in a functioning system. However, behind the ambitious promises to restore Brussels’ trust and unlock frozen funds lies a series of contradictions and risks that cast doubt on the success of any future reforms.
Tisza’s primary foreign policy goal is to return Hungary to the club of the EU’s privileged partners. The party’s manifesto is filled with pledges to restore the rule of law and democratic norms, which would automatically unlock access to billions of euros from European funds. Yet the details of these reforms are vague, and the means of their implementation are unspecified.
The key problem lies not in Tisza’s willingness to negotiate, but in political reality. Even if it secures a majority and the prime minister’s office, the party will face formidable resistance from political opponents. Any new government would have to seek compromises, which will inevitably limit its room for maneuver. In this context, following the experience with Poland, Brussels will demand hard guarantees, not merely a shift in foreign policy rhetoric.
Despite its pro-Western orientation, Tisza professes a commitment to defending national sovereignty. The party states it is ready to advocate for Hungary’s interests within alliances, not against them. At the same time, the political force aims to access frozen EU funds, the fate of which will be decided based on decisions that are highly unpopular domestically.
Migration policy will remain the most sensitive area. Tisza promises to maintain the border fence and firmly oppose migrant quotas. However, the rhetoric of “border protection” will inevitably clash with EU legal obligations. Unlike the Orbán government, which tended to ignore European norms and pay fines, Tisza would likely return to the negotiating table. Experts fear that the outcome of these negotiations may not fully align with national interests: concessions to Brussels would be the unavoidable price for financial solidarity.
Thank you.
Finally someone recognised that this is all just a pile of contradictions.
But the question posed by the article has a great flaw. Tisza is going to loose. So the whole exercise remains purely theoretical.
‘Can Tisza reset relations with the EU and not betray its voters?’
How can one betray Hungarian voters who wish to betray Hungary?
The obstacle to receiving EU funding is Rule of Law and a stop to rampant corruption. Outside of the Fidesz aligned thieves who steal EU and Hungarian money this reform is not at all anyting that would be “unpopular” but instead extremely popular for Hungarians. Migration policy is more a side issue which Poland which has similar ideas to Hungary’s hardline is navigating with the EU and is able to keep its’ funding. Hungary may be asked to take in a token number refugees which is nothing terrible. That can be dealt with. The main thing is that being in the EU is a “team sport” and Hungary has not been a team player for far too long. Hungary needs to act not just for national interest but common interest. Everyone is better off when the team functions together in solidarity. We can’t continue with Hungary being the sole dissenter out of 27 again and again. No organization will ever reward that kind of behaviour.
Exactly Larry. Even though last year Hungary has got around 400 asylm pushed cases from the EU and cost each case to reject is around 20,000 €. The whole migration dilema is just a joke exagerrated by Fidesz to frighten Hungarians!.
‘Migration policy is more a side issue which Poland which has similar ideas to Hungary’s hardline is navigating with the EU and is able to keep its’ funding.’
For 2 reasons :
Poland does bend the knee on a variety of issues, other than immigration, more than Hungary.
Also, the EU and NATO desperately need Poland in on the Russian regime-change operation Barbarossa 2.0, going on in The Ukraine.