Woman in Hungarian prison with severe allergies given bread and lard to eat, loses 13 kgs

Change language:

The Hungarian Helsinki Committee has taken on the case of a woman with severe allergies who has been in prison for 22 months. Over the course of her incarceration, she lost considerable weight, going down from 56 to 43 kilos. Despite her deteriorating condition and having repeated allergy attacks due to inadequate care, she remained behind bars. Now, the Hungarian state will pay her EUR 5,200 in reparations.

The Hungarian Helsinki Committee has made progress in a case representing a 53-year-old woman who has been detained since 20 January 2020 for crimes against property. The Committee alleges that although the woman is in a potentially life-threatening situation in prison, she has not been provided with adequate care. Strasbourg declared the state has to pay her EUR 5,200 for the violation of her rights.

Woman suffers from severe allergies but neither the prison nor her relatives can provide adequate care for her

Corroborating the Committee’s claims is a report from a doctor who works in one of the prisons where she was held, which stated that “[t]he institution cannot ensure the complete exclusion of certain allergens. Given her medical history, this could lead to a serious, even life-threatening condition.”

The woman suffers from severe allergies. She is sensitive to various cosmetics, preservatives, and certain foods (e.g. milk, bran, soya), but also to many cleaning products, dust, dog hair, and plant pollens. Moreover, as the Helsinki Observer blog reported back in 2022, she also developed new allergies in prison, so she now cannot have eggs.

Her condition is so acute that if she comes into contact with these substances, for example, if they get into her food, she may suffer a potentially life-threatening attack, known as anaphylactic shock.

This, as the Committee highlights, has happened four times during her incarceration: she had to be taken to an outside hospital multiple times to receive life-saving treatment. Three of the cases were presumably because of food contamination, and the fourth because she received medication from a spoon that had residues on it to which she was allergic.

The woman’s relatives are also unable to send parcels to the prison to provide her with food and toiletries that she would be safe to interact with. Under current Hungarian legislation, food can only be purchased from prison canteens or from the prison’s webshop. However, almost all of the food available there contains preservatives that are dangerous to the woman’s health and life.

Her meals are thus lacking, and possibly dangerous. The Helsinki Committee reports, for example, that there were weeks when she received a total of 2 kilos of lard a week, in addition to the 0.4 kilos of daily bread she was given in the morning. To add “variety” to her meals, she was given a red onion or an apple at dinner, and smoked bacon twice a week.

Continue reading

2 Comments

  1. Sucks to be her. It’s a prison, not an all-inclusive resort.

    Incidentally, the “Helsinki Committee” is yet another Soros-backed N.G.O., with ZERO democratic mandate, that is interfering in countries’ sovereignty. These N.G.O.s need to be dismantled and banned. At the same time, the E.Ct.H.R. also needs to be disbanded (or, at least, Hungary needs to withdraw from the Convention) as it serves no useful purpose anymore and keeps passing ever more bizarre judgments.

  2. People who are convicted of crimes serve a sentence but they have the obvious human right to be provided conditions that do not threaten their health. 5,000 euros in reparations is meaningless if you are kept in a state of starvation close to death. Hungary has been sliding into evil with the way it treats prisoners. God forbid that the country starts imprisoning people for their political beliefs leading to “Russian style outcomes” such as what happened to Navalny and so many others. Thank goodness that organizations like the Hungarian Helsinki Committee exist to advocate for people who are powerless in the face of abuse by the state. These organizations expose governments to unwanted public and international scrutiny acting as a deterrent to further abusw of human rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *