Top Court Rules: Laws Can Override FX Contracts But Must Balance Interests

Change language:
Budapest, March 17 (MTI) -Existing contracts for foreign-currency mortgages may be modified by legislation, Hungary’s Constitutional Court ruled today.
The ruling came after the government asked the court to weigh the constitutionality of several conditions in the forex loan contracts. The government wanted to know whether existing contracts that burden many Hungarian households could be changed through legislation.
Among the government’s concerns was that borrowers had not been warned of the risks that a falling exchange rate would have on their monthly repayments.
Hungarian banks had feared the court may find the contracts unconstitutional, and this could have led to lenders’ further losses.
The court said the interests of all sides must be fairly taken into consideration.
It added that parliament may only legislate to change forex loan contracts if a lower court finds a clause unlawful. Further, it may do so only if major change in circumstances took place after a contract was signed in a way that harmed the rights of one of the parties involved.
Gergely Gulyas, a lawmaker for the ruling Fidesz party, welcomed the top court’s ruling as “a clear message” to legislators in the next parliamentary cycle. If Fidesz is re-elected, it will completely phase out forex mortgages, he told a press conference. “Fidesz does not want a single forex mortgage contract to stay in place,” he said.
Economy Minister Mihaly Varga said after the decision that the ruling backed the government’s measures. These reflect an effort to make decisions based on constitutionality which balance interests, he said. Accordingly, there are now fewer forex borrowers and the country is less vulnerable, Varga said. After the general election, the next government should continue to phase out FX loans from the market, he added.
The government had asked the top court to consider the constitutional clause that declares: “Hungary shall ensure the conditions for fair economic competition, act against any abuse of a dominant position and shall defend the rights of consumers.”
The government wanted to know whether some terms of the contracts, such as obliging mortgage holders to bear the risk of exchange-rate losses or allowing banks to raise interest rates unilaterally, could be declared unconstitutional accordingly.
Earlier Hungary’s supreme court, the Kuria, ruled that lending in foreign currencies was legal, and the client should bear the risks related to exchange-rate fluctuations. But the Kuria’s ruling was partial, since deferred its opinion on whether it was permissible for contract to be modified by a bank unilaterally and whether banks were legally obliged to have warned about exchange-rate margins.
Gulyas said the Kuria had no reason to delay giving its opinion on those two issues. Its opinion can be expected in May, and the new parliament can then settle the matter within a few weeks, he added.





